Congressman Scott Garrett Balks At The Opportunity To Go On the Record About Corruption

This is my first post for the Rootstrikers campus team blog.  Rootstrikers is a nonprofit, grassroots organization that strives to reduce the influence of dirty money in politics.  Led by the efforts of the campus teams, Rootstrikers is currently working in conjunction with the huffington post to get politicians “On the Record” about the corrupting influence of money big money in politics.  Here I discuss Congressman Scott Garrett’s (NJ-5) response to my attempts to get him “On the Record”.  FYI, Congressman Garrett, I will not cease my efforts.

Anyone who has ever listened to a hard-hitting interview with a politician, comes to realize that there is no other profession in the world whose members are quite so adept at evading the tough questions with circuitous rambling and ultimately inconclusive answers.  But can you really blame them?  Thanks, in no small part, to our nation’s corrupt system of funding elections, America’s lawmakers remain caught right in the center of the endless tug of war being waged on Capitol Hill between the interests of the “funders” and the interests of the people.  So despite the fact that nearly 90% of Americans think decisive action needs to be taken to eliminate corruption in our political system, I sympathize with the fact that Congressman Scott Garrett of New Jersey’s 5th District is just not yet willing to give the American people his straightforward opinion on this defining issue of our time.  Representative Garrett’s response to my requests for a brief phone interview to discuss this urgent threat to the survival of our democracy was short, sweet, and to the point.

He chose to frame the issue of the corrupting influence of money in politics around the recent referral of the Fair Elections Now Act (H.R. 269) to the House Administration Committee where it is currently undergoing review.  If this piece of legislation was to become law, it would allow federal candidates to run competitive campaigns for office without having to depend on large contributions, big money bundlers, or lobbyist donations.  They would do this by raising a larger number of small contributions, no more than $100 per contribution, from their local communities.  Once a House member has amassed 1500 contributions or $50,000 he or she will receive $1,125,000 from the fair elections fund.  Forty percent of that amount is earmarked for the primary, while sixty percent is reserved for use in the general election.  In addition, candidates who reach the sought number of 1500 contributions qualify for additional matching Fair Elections Funds as long as they are able to continue raising small dollar donations from their home state.  Five dollars is matched from the Fair Elections Fund for every dollar House candidates raise from small-time contributors.  The formula for determining Fair Elections funding for Senate candidates is slightly more complex, but nonetheless works towards the same goal of eliminating Congress’ dependence upon the funders and restoring political power solely to the people.

After pointing out that he is not a member of the House Administration Committee, Representative Garrett concludes his response by saying that if the H.R. 269 is able to make it out of committee and to the House floor for a vote, he will consider it with the concerns of one New Jersey Rootstriker fresh in his mind.  I will say that even if this bill comes out of committee with modifications, there is no concrete reason why Representative Garrett should be dead set against taking a stand on it right now.  If this bill does make it to a vote on the House floor, I can guarantee you one thing Congressman Garrett.  My fellow Rootstrikers and I, along with the people of the fifth district of New Jersey, and the rest of the American people will be watching and you will be held accountable.  That is a promise.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Congressman Scott Garrett Balks At The Opportunity To Go On the Record About Corruption

    • Thanks I appreciate it. I live in the 5th. I prefer to stay outside the “inside” political realm if you know what I mean. I’ve had previous experience as an intern with Bill Pascrell’s most recent re-election campaign, and twas not very pleasant

      • Campaigns are never pleasant but they are necessary. Former friends going after each other is no fun. I certainly understand why you feel the way you do. But it’s going to take a real fight to get representation in Washington willing to fight for campaign finance reform, gun safety, etc. Scott Garrett is not such a person.

      • I agree with you on Garrett, but the system corrupts democrats as much as it does Republicans and both parties depend on it immensely so I don’t believe any real change will ever be achieved within the system we have now. I wasn’t actually with the campaign during the primary. I joined in August, so the hatred all our people had for Rothman didn’t rub off on me. Haha. although I believe now he’s a lobbyist in the defense industry…hate that. I just didn’t like the atmosphere of a campaign. Plus I was a lowly intern performing very mundane duties. But certainly campaigns are necessary.

      • No question that big money is really the only way to get elected. I too am a member of rootstrikers. That said, it’s about electing people who are willing to take real action on the problem and not just give us lip service. Scott Garrett is never going to be on our side so the choice is living with him or helping someone else get in who is willing to make that fight.

      • oh I had no idea you were a rootstriker. I actually only know two from nj but they’re actually members of nyc rootstrikers, since we don’t really have a strong presence as far as I can tell in northern nj. I checked out your website and completely agree with your movement to unseat Garrett. Perhaps I’ll get involved. I’ll sign up for your mailing list. Do you happen to know when Scott Garrett is having a town hall meeting or something similar?

      • Scott Garrett rarely holds a live town hall meeting. I think he’s afraid to face his constituents. Instead he holds “town hall” meetings via random conference calls so his staff can pre-screen the questions. As far as rootstrikers is concerned; one only needs to see Lawrence Lessig speak a single time before it becomes obvious he’s on the right track.

I write to dialogue. So please, let's engage each other in some dialogue.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s